I'd just like to comment that, before anybody chooses to believe or not believe this video, go and look for your own answers.
No point just bobbing your head in agreement just because somebody made a documentary about it. The opposite is also true; before you doubt the validity of the points given, why not prove them wrong?
At least the guys who made this did their homework. They didn't just pull an opinion out of a hat. Say only? You also say only, ok. Edited? Well, show us how. Type and simply put a name? Go find out if those reports or article exist. It's the age of the internet, information at your fingertips. Otherwise, also "say only".
If you can't be bothered because you are lazy then don't make claims for either side. They've got a fancy video documentary. What have you got?
I'm a big sceptic of these things as well, but I keep an open mind at all times. I think of these conspiracy theories as questions being asked. It poses questions to the people to look for the truth themselves.
People now are so gullible (ie easily duped by the government or other parties with the power of the media on their side) precisely because they just swallow what is spoon fed to them, especially if its on TV and from big broadcasting giants. Why? Because they are big company mah, CNN, BBC ler...what they say must be the truth right? Some cibai lanciao kia who make their own video, no CNN, no BBC, no Discovery, must be false one lar, hor?
PS: BTW, it was claimed after 9/11 by "experts" and reported by CNN and etc. that the collapse of the towers were due to intense flames melting the massively strong concrete and steel core of the towers. This was a claim made after other experts said that the WTC towers were strong enough to withstand the force of the airplane crashing into it and that they wouldn't collapse just because of that.
Just so you guys know why they showed other burning buildings.
