From Satria Evo, to Kelisa YRV

[zahidee]

There is one guy interedted to swap his car with mine.
I mostly driving in town area and travel from JB to terengganu during school holidays.
My satria is 1.6 model converted to evo engine endorsed 2000cc with gti bodypart.

main reason i consider his car because:
1.cheaper roadtax
2.low FC,maybe?
3.newer car(2004), compared to my car.
4.Auto
5.its turbo,too.

worth it or not?


my car:

his car:

 

[Supra_Fanatics]

There is one guy interedted to swap his car with mine.
I mostly driving in town area and travel from JB to terengganu during school holidays.
My satria is 1.6 model converted to evo engine endorsed 2000cc with gti bodypart.

main reason i consider his car because:
1.cheaper roadtax
2.low FC,maybe?
3.newer car(2004), compared to my car.
4.Auto
5.its turbo,too.

worth it or not?

If he love your car and you love his car. Then no problem is a problem. Worth it or not is up to you to weigh whether is worth the swap for your car.

 

[RENESIS VIII]

I don't know what you think but your Satria seems to be in a rather good condition at least externally. Looked like it worth more than the Kelisa...

 

[123]

auto? for me a no no

 

[ericmaxman]

Keep your Satria.

 

[Izso]

YRV doesn't come manual. If you want a smaller car, an auto car, a cheaper overall car and probably value is lesser as spare parts car, then sure swap it. Oh I forgot to mention as well, slower on track compared to your Satria car.

Swap with top up.. that's a different story.

But a YRV on a super lightweight chassis like the Kelisa would be bloody fast even though it's auto.

But I'll bet a 2.0T on a Satria is plenty fun too.

All depends on what it is you want. For me I'd rather stick with the Satria.

 

[RENESIS VIII]

auto? for me a no no

But YRV don't have manual... Not sure what will happen if try to mate K3-VET with K3-VE manual transmission...

YRV doesn't come manual. If you want a smaller car, an auto car, a cheaper overall car and probably value is lesser as spare parts car, then sure swap it. Oh I forgot to mention as well, slower on track compared to your Satria car.

Swap with top up.. that's a different story.

But a YRV on a super lightweight chassis like the Kelisa would be bloody fast even though it's auto.

But I'll bet a 2.0T on a Satria is plenty fun too.

All depends on what it is you want. For me I'd rather stick with the Satria.

Fast on straights but not on corners. Satria wins on handling and stability... Besides, I think Satria gives out a more serious look compared to a Kelisa turbo...

 

[gunnerzz]

My answer is;
There is no replacement for displacement.

 

[upbeatmantis]

keep the satria..

 

[twistedichc]

give it a try first, driving for the whole month maybe, "feel" the pros & cons & vice versa for the fish owner, what will u be in let say 5 years from now, big family @ still fast & furious is a thing to consider too. 1 to 1 swap maybe is a loss for u except no headache in performance wise, u might get more if selling & get the same fish elsewhere.

 

[DanzEterna]

not worth it at all, keep the satria.

 

[RENESIS VIII]

not worth it at all, keep the satria.

Agree with you. 4G63T is better than K3-VET.

 

[DracBrax]

keep the satria, kelisa chrome here chrome there, a bit cheap looking dont u think?

 

[john_unai]

keep ur satria, bro. or u can swap wif my 1.5 satria, 2.0 is so much fun leh

 

[zahidee]

2.0t sure so much fun.thinking to reduce my fuel expense.its not i cant afford the fc of 2.0t but will be better if i can save more $$$ for better car upgrade in future.thats y i consider this swap.and endorse 2000cc into satria/wira is like a sacred animal now.then thinking on keep the satria pulak.

 

[^pomen_GTR^]

keep the satria......

 

[YellowFlash]

Keep u won't regret but swap u may.

 

[vr2turbo]

YRV doesn't come manual. If you want a smaller car, an auto car, a cheaper overall car and probably value is lesser as spare parts car, then sure swap it. Oh I forgot to mention as well, slower on track compared to your Satria car.

Swap with top up.. that's a different story.

But a YRV on a super lightweight chassis like the Kelisa would be bloody fast even though it's auto.

But I'll bet a 2.0T on a Satria is plenty fun too.

All depends on what it is you want. For me I'd rather stick with the Satria.

A 4G63T is a Wira already super light compared to my VR. Now in Satria even more fun, and manual....

---------- Post added at 08:59 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:58 AM ----------

But YRV don't have manual... Not sure what will happen if try to mate K3-VET with K3-VE manual transmission...



Fast on straights but not on corners. Satria wins on handling and stability... Besides, I think Satria gives out a more serious look compared to a Kelisa turbo...

Bro. SF don't think so leh! His fish will be up against bro. Izso STD woh!....

 

[RENESIS VIII]

2.0t sure so much fun.thinking to reduce my fuel expense.its not i cant afford the fc of 2.0t but will be better if i can save more $$$ for better car upgrade in future.thats y i consider this swap.and endorse 2000cc into satria/wira is like a sacred animal now.then thinking on keep the satria pulak.

Other than Kelisa YRV, why not consider going for NA if you aim to reduce the expenses on fuel. Although a bit lacking in torque, high revving NA engines like 4A-GE, B16A, B16B, B18C, 4G92 MIVEC can be fun as well.