hey, here is malaysia. they aint gonna have trial with ppl protesting / fighting over whether it is right or wrong to kill a snatch thief in the process by civilian.
what's the moral value in this case? (remember our days in our early age, we would read tonnes of story books on how the baddies get his BIG PAYDAY?)
the arguement is too controversial. imagine prosecuting the lady. IF the lady get to walk free from this trial, means in future every1 have the right to "kill" snatch thief in the process of catching them and they have a strong reference case that this "right" to do so.
if she get jailed, means you'll get tonnes of outraged civilian parading on the street and screaming infront of police station / court.
as much as how police officers throwing sticks and ramming into mat racers to catch them. nobody really bother to make a big case out of it also.
as in the press, didnt mention she hit them and kill the snatch thief enough for us to know the answer.
1 snatch thief GONE, dozen more to replace.
1 life is gone, dozen more babies to come.
you snatched sumtin, GOD gonna snatch sumtin back. this time his time is UP, his life got snatched.
and he tot he gonna get away. stealing and cheating is never right. you steal, you pay. you cheat, you will get back equal.
law of equilibrium.
dah takdir.
