Menu
Home
Post Something
Forums
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
News & Features
The Marketplace
Cars for Sale
Engine and Performance
Chassis and Wheels
Exterior and Body
Interior and Cockpit
ICE - In Car Entertainment
Car Shops and Services
Toys and Wares
All Other Stuff
Jobs and Vacancies
Looking For
Members
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
See what others are reading now! Try Forums >
Current Activity
Home
Forums
Main Forums
General Talk
Nuclear power
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FVel" data-source="post: 1063482160" data-attributes="member: 48425"><p>csl,</p><p></p><p>I’m not even going to bother replying your points. All your suggestions are based on fantasy. It has no technical basis. Just complete utter garbage. I don’t want to spend any more time than necessary engaging in discussions with no-clue nitwits with an over-developed sense of grandeur. </p><p></p><p>To think that some of us here actually had experience dealing with radiation issues on a regular basis and understood more than most people on the subject, it is nevertheless insulting that we are still being second-guessed by half-wits like you and accused of being narrow-minded with an attitude problem. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, I think the one with the worst attitude here is you.</p><p></p><p>A few posts earlier, you are the one forcing the discussion towards technical issues when you questioned why we did not discuss SCRAM.</p><p></p><p>Obviously, after being made to look foolish by me for not understanding SCRAM and its association with the coolant systems, you now decide to change your tune and accuse us of being technical. </p><p></p><p>csl, you are a fraud. </p><p></p><p>You cannot even engage in discussions in a fair manner. When things are not going your way, you decide to move the goalposts and stack the deck in your favor.</p><p></p><p>Basically, you cannot accept when people disagree with you, irrespective of how considered their opinions may be. </p><p></p><p>For example, you had a meltdown a few posts earlier when Mizunori debated with facts against you. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like I said, you are self-important and narcissistic. You have virtually no clue on the technical aspects but still that did not stop you from suggesting engineering solutions. </p><p></p><p>How does a guy who does not even understand how a reactor work actually have so much arrogance to suggest engineering solutions for nuclear reactors and, at the same time, accuse the collective community for being lazy, having a negative attitude and not doing all the research ?? </p><p></p><p>Oh, by the way, when you drew up your picture on how to build infrastructure for a reactor, that is ‘technical’ despite your earlier suggestion of ‘displeasure’ for anything of that sort……not that you notice when it suits you. When it does not suit you, you accuse me of being too technical. Gee…… You really are dumb</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As usual ? LOL...As usual you write a lot of science fiction and people here are not getting educated in any substantive way by your ramblings. Please get a hold of yourself. You are not that smart, even if you think so. </p><p></p><p>By the way, what does 'csl' really stand for ? "<strong>C</strong>rap by the <strong>S</strong>hit <strong>L</strong>oads " ?<span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 11:42 AM ----------</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p></p><p>Hi Richard,</p><p></p><p>There's a minimum size to what is feasible to power a national grid compared to powering a nuclear sub.</p><p></p><p>Two very different considerations and two very different power requirements. Submarine reactors are rated at hundreds of megawatts whereas power utility reactors are well over thousands of megawatts.</p><p></p><p>I cannot confirm Veloc's numbers on the costs of commissioning but it does not sound unreasonable. Reactors, and their infrastructure and support, even the smaller ones are very expensive. </p><p></p><p>There is also the question whether a total national population of only 28 million have a really dire need for nuclear power. </p><p></p><p>For one thing, it won't solve the oil dependency issue. </p><p></p><p>For another nuclear power has always been supplemental to more conventional means of power generation. It has not replaced conventional power even in nations that employ nuclear power.</p><p></p><p>Another point is, nations with nuclear power are, by and large, heavily industrialized with heavy population vis-a-vis the rest of the world. Their needs for power probably justify the path towards nukes to supplement the power equation. Malaysia is just 28 million heads and not particularly industrialized.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FVel, post: 1063482160, member: 48425"] csl, I’m not even going to bother replying your points. All your suggestions are based on fantasy. It has no technical basis. Just complete utter garbage. I don’t want to spend any more time than necessary engaging in discussions with no-clue nitwits with an over-developed sense of grandeur. To think that some of us here actually had experience dealing with radiation issues on a regular basis and understood more than most people on the subject, it is nevertheless insulting that we are still being second-guessed by half-wits like you and accused of being narrow-minded with an attitude problem. Personally, I think the one with the worst attitude here is you. A few posts earlier, you are the one forcing the discussion towards technical issues when you questioned why we did not discuss SCRAM. Obviously, after being made to look foolish by me for not understanding SCRAM and its association with the coolant systems, you now decide to change your tune and accuse us of being technical. csl, you are a fraud. You cannot even engage in discussions in a fair manner. When things are not going your way, you decide to move the goalposts and stack the deck in your favor. Basically, you cannot accept when people disagree with you, irrespective of how considered their opinions may be. For example, you had a meltdown a few posts earlier when Mizunori debated with facts against you. Like I said, you are self-important and narcissistic. You have virtually no clue on the technical aspects but still that did not stop you from suggesting engineering solutions. How does a guy who does not even understand how a reactor work actually have so much arrogance to suggest engineering solutions for nuclear reactors and, at the same time, accuse the collective community for being lazy, having a negative attitude and not doing all the research ?? Oh, by the way, when you drew up your picture on how to build infrastructure for a reactor, that is ‘technical’ despite your earlier suggestion of ‘displeasure’ for anything of that sort……not that you notice when it suits you. When it does not suit you, you accuse me of being too technical. Gee…… You really are dumb As usual ? LOL...As usual you write a lot of science fiction and people here are not getting educated in any substantive way by your ramblings. Please get a hold of yourself. You are not that smart, even if you think so. By the way, what does 'csl' really stand for ? "[B]C[/B]rap by the [B]S[/B]hit [B]L[/B]oads " ?[COLOR="Silver"] [SIZE=1]---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 11:42 AM ----------[/SIZE] [/COLOR] Hi Richard, There's a minimum size to what is feasible to power a national grid compared to powering a nuclear sub. Two very different considerations and two very different power requirements. Submarine reactors are rated at hundreds of megawatts whereas power utility reactors are well over thousands of megawatts. I cannot confirm Veloc's numbers on the costs of commissioning but it does not sound unreasonable. Reactors, and their infrastructure and support, even the smaller ones are very expensive. There is also the question whether a total national population of only 28 million have a really dire need for nuclear power. For one thing, it won't solve the oil dependency issue. For another nuclear power has always been supplemental to more conventional means of power generation. It has not replaced conventional power even in nations that employ nuclear power. Another point is, nations with nuclear power are, by and large, heavily industrialized with heavy population vis-a-vis the rest of the world. Their needs for power probably justify the path towards nukes to supplement the power equation. Malaysia is just 28 million heads and not particularly industrialized. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
The Marketplace Latest
Honda CITY 1.5 E (A)
Started by
PIstonHeads
Cars for sale
original BBS RE013 18x8jj offset +50 5H pcd 5x112...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
original rare Yokohama ADVAN Racing RG3 18x8 18x8.5...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
original Endless M4 S2 4pot 2pot brake caliper set...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
original rare Yokohama ADVAN Racing RG2 17x8.5jj...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
original rare WedsSport TC005 17x7jj offset +40 5H...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
Vifa Speakers Audison Amp
Started by
samuel118
ICE -In Car Entertainment
original rare Yokohama ADVAN Racing RG3 18x8.5...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
Carbing R35 GTR GTR35 Brake Master Cylinder Stopper
Started by
aycy
Engine and Performance
GR Corolla Hypertune Bolt On Intercooler
Started by
aycy
Engine and Performance
Posts refresh every 5 minutes
4x4 18inch rim good tire?
Hello all!
I am kind of new to 4x4 world but somehow just bought it. I thought of putting in new 18inch sport rim. The truck is meant for 80% city use and 20% mild off road.
I hope anybody can recommend reasonable...
"DON'T" on track day
Hi all track kakis,
Good day!
What do you think that really jump on your nerve when you are enjoying on/off the track?
What do you think about ppl who park their car at the pit door for showing off with picture...
WEBER or INJECTION ?
I have been considering to upgrade my air intake. I know export models of Saga uses ECU. How do I get that?
And I been wondering how WEBER will do on Saga engine oso.
Im using 1.3cc Iswara.....
Any sifu here to...
Recent Posts
Honda Malaysia Doubles Down on Hybrids: New CR-V Launches with Dual e:HEV...
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
BateriHub Reaches 200-Store Milestone, Becomes Malaysia’s Largest...
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Been stalking for 3 years edy
Started by
dheepadarshan95
Introduction and Newbies
Recommendation: Turbocharger for 4B11 N.A engine
Started by
Mitevo7
Car Modification
2026 Vios HEV launched with Local Battery Assembly - UMW Toyota Motor
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Search
Online now
Enjoying Zerotohundred?
Log-in
for an ad-less experience
Home
Forums
Main Forums
General Talk
Nuclear power