Top mount vs front mount intercooler...
Any comment??
1. power efficiency
2. Lagging ( how much rpm difference )
Any comment??
1. power efficiency
2. Lagging ( how much rpm difference )
top mount vs front mount intercooler
- Thread starter ctmaxseen
- Start date
- Replies 3
- Views 2K
-
See what others are reading now! Try Forums > Current Activity
front mount is always better as its has more cooling efficientcy compared to top mount with air scoop.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2006
- Messages
- 6,613
- Points
- 1,713
top mount is more a compact setup. Cheap for manufacturer as standard setup.
Also, top mount suffers "heat soak" when car isn't moving while engine kept running. Heat soak reduces dispersion of heat capability of the intercooler.
front mount intercooler might be prone to damages like stone strikes, or frontal car accident...
Also, top mount suffers "heat soak" when car isn't moving while engine kept running. Heat soak reduces dispersion of heat capability of the intercooler.
front mount intercooler might be prone to damages like stone strikes, or frontal car accident...
front mount has better cooling than top mount. but to a race car, they need better cooling for radiator rather than boost as they revving the engine hard.. u have to know what ur setup u want..
Similar threads
The Marketplace Latest
-
Proton S70 body kit
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
-
Proton saga BLM body kit
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
Posts refresh every 5 minutes
Congratulations all listed drivers!, The Hall of Fame has finally been released. The scoreboard represents Time to Attack: Sepang...
Recent Posts
Search
Enjoying Zerotohundred?
Log-in for an ad-less experience