Full Review: Hyundai i30N Performance / 275ps / 6-speed manual

I do not want to base in on power figures or displacement. That would be like playing Top Trumps or trading cards. Just about anyone can sort the numbers and figure what car goes where. I wouldn't even need to drive the cars then.

I want to rate how good a candidate is as a driver's car through its abilities, not rank them by biggest number.

It would be unfair to rank the 340i's power aspect lower than the A45 simply based on power value. It may make less power on paper than the A45S but we need to consider the power delivery, 6 cylinder vs 4 cylinder, etc etc.

I understand where you are coming from. I guess one would really need to read your article, and not rely so much on your scoring, because if they just look at the scores and look at it objectively they would miss your point.
 
I understand where you are coming from. I guess one would really need to read your article, and not rely so much on your scoring, because if they just look at the scores and look at it objectively they would miss your point.

miss my point as in?

How is the scoring any different than using something like 3 out of 5 stars? Would that be easier to understand? if one assume high points mean higher perceived value then that's where it gets messy
 
Last edited:
As in to mention what's lacking which would have made it a 10 pointer?

Or you mean a 10 pointer example for each aspect that people can refer to?
the 2nd statement, which you can use example or your own exemplary standard
 
i read review, i scroll to verdict/bottom line..etc u name it.
If that summary catches my interest i will read whole review.
5 Stars rating is not bad.
0-10 pointer create huge range for cars lovers. Everyone butt dyno is different.
 

Similar threads

Posts refresh every 5 minutes




Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience