cool wall being serious or not is not the point, as a matter of fact, top gear on it's own is nothing more than car show that even a non enthusist could watch and wouldn't fall asleep. however conflicting oppinions from a big icon (jeremy) in the car world on the tele is an issue.
jokes, yes, however it's not entirely un-true. jeremey wasn't on the initial list for the ford and only much later on was he added on. even that was after all the ford's reviews went abnormally possitive.
unless u're jeremy's kid or somethin, no idea wut u gettin so defensive about. saying jeremy is a big kid was nothing against him as a tv presentor, but as a "petrolhead" i just think he should be slightly interested or even just slightly elaborate on the technical side of a car isntead of. i trashed this car, i like. on a few occasions, (due to lack of info available on the cars that he reviewed) he kinda leaves the viewers annoyed. it's a brilliant car, u want to know more, but he gives you nothing besides, "this car is great fun".
ok, u got me there, hehehe. i'm jus a viper fan. and didn't elaborate enough on what i ment. the car choice is just poor at times. if they were going to put down any car, at least give it a fair shot. and M is just as mcuh of a tuner as Shelby or even Hennessy. only difference is ownership.
i drove an srt10 up agaist a hamM3. car i was driving wasn't modified. M3 coudn't even come close. only on tight corners will the M3 catch up a bit but on wide bends, difference was negligable. my experience with the hennessy done king snake to say the least would be that it would give an enzo a good run for it's money. didn't get the pleasure of being on the track with the enzo but timing difference was +4 seconds to d enzo.
ps. people who are yet to be sure about the point of view of another and has a go at them prior to clarification, really need help.
jokes, yes, however it's not entirely un-true. jeremey wasn't on the initial list for the ford and only much later on was he added on. even that was after all the ford's reviews went abnormally possitive.
unless u're jeremy's kid or somethin, no idea wut u gettin so defensive about. saying jeremy is a big kid was nothing against him as a tv presentor, but as a "petrolhead" i just think he should be slightly interested or even just slightly elaborate on the technical side of a car isntead of. i trashed this car, i like. on a few occasions, (due to lack of info available on the cars that he reviewed) he kinda leaves the viewers annoyed. it's a brilliant car, u want to know more, but he gives you nothing besides, "this car is great fun".
ok, u got me there, hehehe. i'm jus a viper fan. and didn't elaborate enough on what i ment. the car choice is just poor at times. if they were going to put down any car, at least give it a fair shot. and M is just as mcuh of a tuner as Shelby or even Hennessy. only difference is ownership.
i drove an srt10 up agaist a hamM3. car i was driving wasn't modified. M3 coudn't even come close. only on tight corners will the M3 catch up a bit but on wide bends, difference was negligable. my experience with the hennessy done king snake to say the least would be that it would give an enzo a good run for it's money. didn't get the pleasure of being on the track with the enzo but timing difference was +4 seconds to d enzo.
ps. people who are yet to be sure about the point of view of another and has a go at them prior to clarification, really need help.
