Which engine is the most powerful 1.6 engine?

[henry4563]

What engine do you think is the most powerful 1.6 engine?

 

[zane_al]

For practical purposes it has to be Proton's .

 

[henry4563]

which engine do you think is the most powerful 1.6 engine? 4AGE? SR16? 4G92? lets discuss :)

 

[nickmat]

Vtec...

 

[D7zul]

Honda B16B
Power: 180 PS (132 kW)180 HP @ 8200 rpm & 118 lb·ft (160 N·m) @ 7500 rpm


Mitsubishi 4G92-MIVEC DOHC 16 Valve
Maximum Output - 128 kW (174 PS; 172 bhp) @ 7,500 rpm
Maximum Torque - 167 N·m (123 ft·lbf) @ 7,000 rpm


Toyota 4A-GE AE-111 20v
165 PS (121 kW) at 7,800 rpm with 16.5 kg·m (162 N·m) of torque at 5,600 rpm


Toyota 4A-GZE AE-101
170 PS (125 kW) 210 N·m (155 ft·lbf)

 

[henry4563]

Honda B16B
Power: 180 PS (132 kW)180 HP @ 8200 rpm & 118 lb·ft (160 N·m) @ 7500 rpm


Mitsubishi 4G92-MIVEC DOHC 16 Valve
Maximum Output - 128 kW (174 PS; 172 bhp) @ 7,500 rpm
Maximum Torque - 167 N·m (123 ft·lbf) @ 7,000 rpm


Toyota 4A-GE
165 PS (121 kW) at 7,800 rpm with 16.5 kg·m (162 N·m) of torque at 5,600 rpm


Toyota 4A-GZE
170 PS (125 kW) 210 N·m (155 ft·lbf)

thanks for the information :)

 

[choon meng]

is it a enginge from mitsubishi 4g61 with turbo?

 

[D7zul]

Forgotten about our very own..

Proton Campro CPS
125 bhp (93 kW; 127 PS) at 6,500 rpm and 150 N·m (110 ft·lbf) of torque at 4,500 rpm

 

[EGNINE]

sr16neo vvl n1?

 

[mADmAN]

the most powerful 1.6 is actually from nissan.... SR16VE Neo VVL or watever the code is...i forgot...

if not mistaken its about 5-10bhp more than the B16B

but this was a very limited production though

 

[spec-c]

Nissan SR16VE N1
197hp @ 7800rpm / 134lb torque @ 7600rpm

"From 1997 to 1998, Nissan produced 500 limited-edition SR16VE N1 engines. These engines made 197 hp (147 kW). They had further upgraded camshafts, upgraded intake manifold using eight injectors and a larger 70 mm (2.8 in) throttle body. These engines were found in the limited-edition Nissan Pulsar VZ-R N1. They were only sold in Japan"

from uncle wiki

 

[WPQ800]

What engine do you think is the most powerful 1.6 engine?

lets get the language right hehehe, well im confused already..... when we say which is the most powerful engine, what do we look into? the higher bhp? or the higher torque?

1. if a car produces 200bhp with 95lb torque....... is it gonna be powerful?
2. if a car produces 95bhp with 200lb torque........is it more powerful?


from experience, a high revving engine like vtec/mivec engine lacks torque, so pick up horrible but highrev of course nice.... is this powerful?
from experience also, an L200s engine which is a small 660cc engine with hp of just 90++ but with 170lb torque have super great pick ups but high rev sucks.....is this powerful?

muahahah im confuse..........
ps: there are also many other factors excluded here, say weight of the car, transmission, etc....

 

[Dayline668]

U left out nissan bro...

Nissan SR16VE
175 PS (129 kW) @7800 rpm and 119 ft·lbf (161 Nm) @7200 rpm. Redline is at 8300 rpm.

Nissan SR16VE N1
200 PS (197 bhp)(147 kW) @ 7800 rpm and 134 ft·lbf (181 Nm) @ 7600 rpm. Redline of the N1 Version 2 (1998) is at 8600 rpm.

Nissan SR16VE N1 is the most powerful production 1.6l Naturally aspirated engine. It was also the highest specific output of any naturally aspirated production piston engine of its time, until surpassed by the Honda F20C engine used in the S2000, which held the record until Ferrari released the 458 Italia in 2010.

PS: Do u guys wanna include stock 1.6 charged engine..?

 

[zane_al]

lets get the language right hehehe, well im confused already..... when we say which is the most powerful engine, what do we look into? the higher bhp? or the higher torque?

1. if a car produces 200bhp with 95lb torque....... is it gonna be powerful?
2. if a car produces 95bhp with 200lb torque........is it more powerful?


from experience, a high revving engine like vtec/mivec engine lacks torque, so pick up horrible but highrev of course nice.... is this powerful?
from experience also, an L200s engine which is a small 660cc engine with hp of just 90++ but with 170lb torque have super great pick ups but high rev sucks.....is this powerful?

muahahah im confuse..........
ps: there are also many other factors excluded here, say weight of the car, transmission, etc....

It has to be the mid-range torque dude.

 

[semangka]

the Pug308/Mini Cooper 1.6 turbocharged prince engine, IMHO.

 

[WPQ800]

It has to be the mid-range torque dude.

owh ok........... but what about the low-to-mid and mid-to-high? arent we suppose to include this factor also?

 

[zane_al]

owh ok........... but what about the low-to-mid and mid-to-high? arent we suppose to include this factor also?

Can't have everything - only dc motors have constant torque.
So the new elec sportscars do have an edge.

 

[YYC]

the Pug308/Mini Cooper 1.6 turbocharged prince engine, IMHO.

Turbo-charged engines should be in different category bro... they are talking about NA only.

 

[papagoines]

Pardon the intrusion, but they didn't mentioned for it to be NA only...

bang for buck sense.. me think forced-inducted ones should win...

...

Turbo-charged engines should be in different category bro... they are talking about NA only.

 

[semangka]

Turbo-charged engines should be in different category bro... they are talking about NA only.

huhu...so u mean there's no turbo engine for 1.6cc? owhh....

anyway, for smaller cc engine especially 1.6cc and below anything with force induction should have more edge compared to NA, IMHO. i'm not gonna elaborate much, but think of the power to weight advantage of force induction compared to NA on a small+compact car, as u know most car manufacturer won't be putting a 1.6cc engine into a bigger size car. even if they would, it would be rather underpowered or it's intended for non-performance car like those mpv/wagon.

different story if the question applied to bigger displacement and more cylinders, that would be another story worth to be discussed.